Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ghanaian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Ghanaians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,403
SOCIAL INDEX
21.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
261st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ghanaian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,345,272 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Ghanaians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 84.5 Ghanaians.
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.6%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,582, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,277, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,810, a difference of 10.4%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,043, a difference of 11.7%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,440, a difference of 14.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Poor $42,164 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Poor $98,877 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,582 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,440 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,810 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Excellent $40,429 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Good $52,594 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $90,137 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Poor $97,277 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Fair $60,043 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.0%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Poor 16.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 35.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 83.0% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 42.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.3% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 109.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 35.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 83.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 48.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 51.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.41%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.83%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 63.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Average 38.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ghanaian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 75.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Average 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Poor 24.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.5% |