Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Sudan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Sudan
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,416
SOCIAL INDEX
41.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
199th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Sudan Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,764,688 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Sudan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Sudan.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $41,986, a difference of 15.1%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $97,737, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $46,791, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,489, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $44,767, a difference of 10.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sudan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Poor $41,986 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $97,737 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $79,103 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $44,767 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $51,489 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,511 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $46,791 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $86,109 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $93,781 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Poor $59,248 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sudan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 23.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 18.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 18.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Average 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Average 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.86%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sudan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Average 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sudan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 82.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.9%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.4%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.86%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sudan |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 60.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 41.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Poor 33.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 26.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sudan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 45.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sudan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Fair 88.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Good 66.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Good 60.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Good 47.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Excellent 39.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Sudan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Sudan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 49.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Sudan |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 11.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Fair 23.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Fair 47.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |