Chickasaw vs Paiute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,860,711 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Paiute within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Paiute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 28.5 Paiute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,743, a difference of 15.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $82,984, a difference of 6.5%), and wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,762, a difference of 0.060%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,414, a difference of 0.070%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,991, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 43.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 2.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 83.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 57.3%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 60.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 17.0%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.58%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 50.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Paiute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 124.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.65%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.7%).