Chickasaw vs Seminole Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Seminole
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Seminole
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Seminole Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,224,417 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Seminole. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 19.9 Seminole.
Chickasaw vs Seminole Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $80,077, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $52,373, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,385, a difference of 0.080%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,180, a difference of 0.81%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $69,420, a difference of 0.84%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Seminole |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $36,180 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $83,354 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $69,420 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $40,233 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $46,783 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $34,385 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,649 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $76,584 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $80,077 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $52,373 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Good 25.6% |
Chickasaw vs Seminole Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 13.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 1.9%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Seminole |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 18.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 22.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 16.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 26.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 35.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Chickasaw vs Seminole Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Seminole |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Seminole Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Seminole |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 62.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 74.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 80.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 78.1% |
Chickasaw vs Seminole Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.36%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Seminole |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Poor 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 37.9% |
Chickasaw vs Seminole Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Seminole |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Excellent 56.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Chickasaw vs Seminole Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.4%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Seminole |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Good 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Average 94.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Poor 93.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.4% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 59.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 52.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 37.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 29.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chickasaw vs Seminole Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Seminole communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Seminole |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 29.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |