Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Lithuanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Lithuanians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Lithuanian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,518,984 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Lithuanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 40.5 Lithuanians.
Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $112,484, a difference of 36.8%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $49,448, a difference of 35.6%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $115,395, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,552, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $65,209, a difference of 21.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Lithuanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $49,448 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $115,395 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $93,852 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $50,991 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $61,228 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $42,108 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,552 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $105,223 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $112,484 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $65,209 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.7% |
Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 51.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 46.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Lithuanian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 34.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.89%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Lithuanian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Lithuanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.55%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Lithuanian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Fair 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.6% |
Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Lithuanian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Average 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 60.1%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 55.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Lithuanian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 42.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chickasaw vs Lithuanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Lithuanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 49.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 13.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Lithuanian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Average 12.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Excellent 10.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |