Chickasaw vs Scottish Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Scottish
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Scottish
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,834
SOCIAL INDEX
65.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
139th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Scottish Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,440,925 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 70.0 Scottish.
Chickasaw vs Scottish Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,123, a difference of 24.2%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $104,288, a difference of 22.2%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $44,440, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.2%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,397, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,554, a difference of 12.9%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Scottish |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Good $44,440 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $104,288 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Average $85,101 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,463 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Good $55,793 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,397 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,554 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Average $94,622 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Good $102,123 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $61,735 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 29.1% |
Chickasaw vs Scottish Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 14.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Scottish |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 21.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chickasaw vs Scottish Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Scottish |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Scottish Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Scottish |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 42.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chickasaw vs Scottish Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.11, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Scottish |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Good 64.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.11 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 49.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Average 31.7% |
Chickasaw vs Scottish Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Scottish |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 6.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 61.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chickasaw vs Scottish Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 35.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 32.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.28%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Scottish |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Excellent 60.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Good 46.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Average 38.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Scottish Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Scottish |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Fair 23.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.5% |