Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Central America Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Central America
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Central America
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
297th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Central America Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,397,361 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.381. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.213% in Immigrants from Central America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 212.8 Immigrants from Central America.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Central America Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,022, a difference of 14.0%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $74,217, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,050, a difference of 0.36%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,420, a difference of 0.58%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $33,953, a difference of 1.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Central America |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $34,974 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $85,050 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $74,217 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $39,762 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $45,538 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $33,953 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $51,022 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $80,012 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $85,965 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $53,420 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Central America Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 28.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 28.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.67%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Central America |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Fair 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 21.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 16.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 33.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Central America Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Central America |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Central America Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.73%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Central America |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Poor 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 35.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Central America Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.55%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 5.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Central America |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 31.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Poor 45.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.49 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Average 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 37.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Central America Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 14.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.68%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 5.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Central America |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Central America Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 113.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Central America |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 94.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 91.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 90.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 89.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 86.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 84.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 83.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 80.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 76.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 54.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 48.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 35.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 27.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Central America Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Central America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Central America |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 26.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |