Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Subsaharan African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Sub-Saharan Africans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Subsaharan African Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,609,466 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.312. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 35.4 Sub-Saharan Africans.
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 19.0%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,391, a difference of 11.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $77,631, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $56,615, a difference of 5.4%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,408, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $84,235, a difference of 8.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $40,152 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $93,748 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $77,631 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $44,118 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $50,408 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,391 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $48,691 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $84,235 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $90,691 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $56,615 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.8% |
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 19.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.91%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 23.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 75.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.7%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 41.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 42.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.7% |
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 55.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 51.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.30%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.55%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 63.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 57.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 35.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Subsaharan African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.0%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Subsaharan African |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |