Chickasaw vs Ugandan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ugandan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Ugandans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,220
SOCIAL INDEX
59.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
159th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ugandan Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,688,684 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Ugandans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 114.0 Ugandans.
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,472, a difference of 25.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,557, a difference of 25.1%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $106,541, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 12.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,923, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,177, a difference of 13.9%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Excellent $45,047 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Excellent $106,541 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Excellent $87,557 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Excellent $47,854 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Good $55,290 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $40,889 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,923 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $96,667 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Excellent $103,472 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $61,177 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.1% |
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Poor 14.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 18.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Poor 17.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Poor 17.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Poor 11.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 11.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.2% |
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Average 11.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 12.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.7% |
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 20.6%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (64.4% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 61.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.1% |
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.7% |
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 52.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 50.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Good 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.4% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.1% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Good 96.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 95.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Excellent 94.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Excellent 89.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ugandan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.1%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.81%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Average 11.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |