Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cameroon Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Cameroon
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Cameroon
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,741
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
194th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Cameroon Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,787,252 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cameroon within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.247% in Immigrants from Cameroon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 1,246.8 Immigrants from Cameroon.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cameroon Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 22.6%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $85,314, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $100,084, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,119, a difference of 9.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $88,214, a difference of 13.2%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $41,334, a difference of 13.3%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Cameroon |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $41,334 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $100,289 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Average $85,314 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,329 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $52,119 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Good $40,354 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Poor $51,433 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $88,214 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $100,084 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,907 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cameroon Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.3%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.56%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Cameroon |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Average 9.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Average 17.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Poor 17.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Poor 17.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cameroon Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Cameroon |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cameroon Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Cameroon |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 68.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cameroon Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.42%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Cameroon |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cameroon Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Cameroon |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Fair 55.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cameroon Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 50.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Cameroon |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.4% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 93.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Fair 64.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 45.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Average 37.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Cameroon Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Cameroon communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 72.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Cameroon |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 23.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |