Chickasaw vs Arapaho Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Arapaho
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Arapaho
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Arapaho Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,921,195 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.610. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.101% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 100.7 Arapaho.
Chickasaw vs Arapaho Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 15.8%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $41,758, a difference of 14.5%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $32,345, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $44,003, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $67,965, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $82,064, a difference of 4.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Arapaho |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $32,345 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $82,064 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $67,965 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $36,586 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $41,758 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $31,489 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $44,003 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $71,697 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $75,945 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Poor $59,383 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.5% |
Chickasaw vs Arapaho Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 34.4%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (26.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Arapaho |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 16.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 17.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 25.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 17.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 24.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 33.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Chickasaw vs Arapaho Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 127.9%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 112.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 112.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Arapaho |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 9.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 11.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 16.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 25.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 19.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Chickasaw vs Arapaho Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.90%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Arapaho |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 62.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 74.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Excellent 37.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 78.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 77.1% |
Chickasaw vs Arapaho Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 29.8%), currently married (46.6% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.64, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Arapaho |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 25.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 41.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.64 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 40.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 47.1% |
Chickasaw vs Arapaho Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 19.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.49%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 6.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Arapaho |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 60.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 26.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chickasaw vs Arapaho Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.4%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.2%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.040%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Arapaho |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 60.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 26.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.2% |
Chickasaw vs Arapaho Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Arapaho |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 28.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |