Chickasaw vs Spanish American Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Spanish American
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Spanish Americans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,871
SOCIAL INDEX
16.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
284th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Spanish American Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,554,516 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish Americans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Spanish Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 68.5 Spanish Americans.
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.3%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $75,386, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $83,722, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,008, a difference of 2.5%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $42,316, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $46,913, a difference of 4.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,012 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $90,322 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $75,386 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,316 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $49,008 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $36,391 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $46,913 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $83,722 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $87,836 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $57,021 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.0%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 16.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 32.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.0% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 39.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.1% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.5%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.25%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 38.6% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 15.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.9%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 56.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 41.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |