Chickasaw vs Pakistani Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Pakistani
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Pakistanis
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pakistani Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,289,013 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Pakistanis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 29.3 Pakistanis.
Chickasaw vs Pakistani Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,317, a difference of 28.1%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $89,638, a difference of 28.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $98,401, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,596, a difference of 18.0%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $56,719, a difference of 18.6%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Pakistani |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Excellent $45,587 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $107,390 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $89,638 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $48,254 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $56,719 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Excellent $40,596 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,325 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $98,401 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $105,317 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,844 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Fair 26.1% |
Chickasaw vs Pakistani Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.5%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 20.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Pakistani |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Excellent 13.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Chickasaw vs Pakistani Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Pakistani |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Pakistani Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Pakistani |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Excellent 37.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 82.8% |
Chickasaw vs Pakistani Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.6%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.40%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.95%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Pakistani |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 47.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.5% |
Chickasaw vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Pakistani |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Chickasaw vs Pakistani Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 42.0%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Pakistani |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 86.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 48.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Excellent 39.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Excellent 15.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Pakistani Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 44.8%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Pakistani |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 11.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Average 23.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Fair 47.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.4% |