Chickasaw vs Liberian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Liberian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Liberians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,824
SOCIAL INDEX
15.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
286th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Liberian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,752,358 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Liberians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.781% in Liberians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 780.6 Liberians.
Chickasaw vs Liberian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 26.8%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,215, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $48,917, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,356, a difference of 1.2%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $49,318, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $82,005, a difference of 5.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Liberian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $38,780 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $91,722 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $75,667 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,536 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $49,318 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,215 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $48,917 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $82,005 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $88,929 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,356 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Chickasaw vs Liberian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 18.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Liberian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Poor 20.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 16.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Poor 29.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Fair 12.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Chickasaw vs Liberian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Liberian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Poor 17.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Liberian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Liberian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Excellent 83.0% |
Chickasaw vs Liberian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 22.7%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Liberian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 42.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 37.4% |
Chickasaw vs Liberian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 52.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 30.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Liberian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 12.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 51.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Liberian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.9%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.050%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.49%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Liberian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Poor 90.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Poor 88.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 85.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 63.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 56.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 34.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Liberian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Liberian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.8%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Liberian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |