Chickasaw vs Hungarian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Hungarian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Hungarians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,572
SOCIAL INDEX
63.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
149th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hungarian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,077,383 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hungarians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Hungarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Hungarians.
Chickasaw vs Hungarian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,913, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $97,544, a difference of 25.2%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,426, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,247, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,673, a difference of 14.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Hungarian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Excellent $45,426 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Excellent $105,609 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $86,920 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Excellent $47,795 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $57,309 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Average $39,510 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,247 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $97,544 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Excellent $103,913 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $61,673 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 29.0% |
Chickasaw vs Hungarian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (26.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 24.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Hungarian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Good 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Good 13.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Poor 14.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 17.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Poor 29.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Chickasaw vs Hungarian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.15%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Hungarian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Average 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Average 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Hungarian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Hungarian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 39.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Fair 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Fair 82.7% |
Chickasaw vs Hungarian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.2%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.35%), family households (64.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Hungarian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Good 31.2% |
Chickasaw vs Hungarian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Hungarian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Excellent 56.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 19.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.4% |
Chickasaw vs Hungarian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 36.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Hungarian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Average 59.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Good 38.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Hungarian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hungarian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Hungarian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.5% |