Chickasaw vs Aleut Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Aleut
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Aleuts
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,609
SOCIAL INDEX
33.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
216th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Aleut Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,985,519 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.225% in Aleuts. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 225.5 Aleuts.
Chickasaw vs Aleut Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $100,052, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,446, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $91,370, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $51,168, a difference of 7.0%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $44,241, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,719, a difference of 12.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Aleut |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Poor $42,210 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Poor $98,702 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,446 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $44,241 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $51,168 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $38,719 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,377 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $91,370 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $100,052 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,708 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 23.7% |
Chickasaw vs Aleut Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.4%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.2%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Aleut |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Poor 9.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Poor 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Fair 16.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 15.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 16.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Poor 12.4% |
Chickasaw vs Aleut Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 56.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 43.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.71%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Aleut |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 21.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 9.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 6.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Average 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Aleut Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Aleut |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.0% |
Chickasaw vs Aleut Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 39.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.15%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Aleut |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Poor 45.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.8% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 39.3% |
Chickasaw vs Aleut Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 65.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 5.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Aleut |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 13.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Chickasaw vs Aleut Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, 1 year or more (53.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.13%), 5th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Aleut |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Average 85.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 39.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 31.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Aleut Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Aleut communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 48.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Aleut |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 28.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 50.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |