Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Yugoslavian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Yugoslavians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Yugoslavian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,413,304 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 30.6 Yugoslavians.
Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,558, a difference of 18.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $82,186, a difference of 17.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $42,792, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,243, a difference of 8.4%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,573, a difference of 12.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Yugoslavian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Fair $42,792 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $100,119 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Poor $82,186 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,846 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Fair $53,967 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,573 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $51,028 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $91,368 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Fair $97,558 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,243 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 26.7% |
Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 16.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Yugoslavian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Excellent 8.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Average 17.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Good 15.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 15.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 16.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Yugoslavian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Yugoslavian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Excellent 65.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 83.0% |
Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 17.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.73%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Yugoslavian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Fair 46.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 47.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Good 30.8% |
Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.6%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 12.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Yugoslavian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 19.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Average 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Yugoslavian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Excellent 86.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Average 59.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 37.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Yugoslavian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.3%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Yugoslavian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Good 17.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Poor 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Fair 2.5% |