Chickasaw vs Iraqi Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Iraqi
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Iraqis
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,167
SOCIAL INDEX
49.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
183rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iraqi Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,381,413 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iraqis within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.069% in Iraqis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 69.2 Iraqis.
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $99,387, a difference of 20.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,753, a difference of 19.6%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $100,658, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,666, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,466, a difference of 12.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Iraqi |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Fair $42,760 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $100,658 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,753 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $46,140 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Average $54,182 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $38,666 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,802 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $90,764 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Fair $99,387 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Fair $60,466 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Poor 26.6% |
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 32.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.8%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.80%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Iraqi |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Poor 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 18.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Poor 17.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Good 20.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Good 28.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.2% |
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Iraqi |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Iraqi |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 31.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.70%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.94%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Iraqi |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Average 64.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 46.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 27.6% |
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Iraqi |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Average 19.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.2%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.60%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Iraqi |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Excellent 66.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Excellent 60.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Good 47.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Good 39.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Iraqi Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iraqi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.5%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Iraqi |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 11.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |