Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ethiopian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Ethiopians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Ethiopian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,458,482 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.345. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Ethiopians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 37.3 Ethiopians.
Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $89,640, a difference of 28.1%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $46,569, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $108,251, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $56,243, a difference of 17.6%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,818, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,989, a difference of 20.9%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Ethiopian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $46,569 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $108,251 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $89,640 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $49,572 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $56,243 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $43,243 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,818 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $96,824 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Excellent $103,736 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $64,989 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 46.2%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 39.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Ethiopian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Good 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Excellent 16.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Average 16.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 13.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Good 10.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Ethiopian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Ethiopian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 69.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 82.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.8% |
Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 21.6%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Ethiopian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 61.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Average 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.8% |
Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Ethiopian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 59.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 57.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.17%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.72%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Ethiopian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 93.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Poor 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Fair 89.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 42.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Chickasaw vs Ethiopian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Ethiopian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 67.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Ethiopian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |