Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Sierra Leonean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Sierra Leoneans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,851
SOCIAL INDEX
46.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
191st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sierra Leonean Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,238,539 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Sierra Leoneans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 50.9 Sierra Leoneans.
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $57,272, a difference of 28.0%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 26.7%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,463, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $54,279, a difference of 13.5%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $48,286, a difference of 18.7%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $43,405, a difference of 19.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Sierra Leonean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Average $43,405 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $103,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Excellent $88,463 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $48,286 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Average $54,279 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $42,868 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $57,272 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Fair $93,435 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Good $102,427 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $65,038 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 33.0%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Sierra Leonean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Poor 9.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Fair 17.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.2% |
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Sierra Leonean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Average 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Sierra Leonean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 68.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Excellent 37.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.5% |
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.86%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Sierra Leonean |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 42.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.9% |
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Sierra Leonean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Poor 89.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 46.9%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 36.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.28%), 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Sierra Leonean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Average 94.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Good 66.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Good 60.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 47.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Sierra Leonean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Sierra Leonean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 79.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Sierra Leonean |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Excellent 10.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 23.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Average 47.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |