Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Australia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Australia
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,900
SOCIAL INDEX
86.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
40th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Australia Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,035,946 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Immigrants from Australia.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $57,953, a difference of 58.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $115,947, a difference of 48.8%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $126,620, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $56,660, a difference of 26.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $69,164, a difference of 28.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Australia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $57,953 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $126,620 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $102,562 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $56,305 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $67,634 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $46,573 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $56,660 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $115,947 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $119,308 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $69,164 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.0%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 16.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Australia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Excellent 10.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Australia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Australia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 35.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Good 82.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.13, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Australia |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 61.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Average 46.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 26.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 75.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Australia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 86.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 105.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 85.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 82.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Australia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 72.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 67.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 55.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 20.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Australia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 66.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.1%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 7.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Australia |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Good 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |