Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Spanish American Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Spanish American Indians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,836
SOCIAL INDEX
15.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
285th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Spanish American Indian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,362,663 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Spanish American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 1.8 Spanish American Indians.
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,573, a difference of 24.1%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $76,670, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,728, a difference of 0.44%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,077, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $33,625, a difference of 2.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American Indian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $34,195 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $85,728 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $76,670 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $38,907 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $44,010 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $33,625 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $55,573 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $84,085 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $87,561 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $53,077 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.5% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 35.1%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 34.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.63%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.95%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American Indian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.9% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.1%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 5.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American Indian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.9% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 32.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.2% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.7%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.58, a difference of 12.4%), and family households (64.4% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American Indian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 71.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Average 46.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.58 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 37.4% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 44.8%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 21.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 60.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 26.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 147.3%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.7%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 2.8%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 95.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 95.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 95.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 95.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 95.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 94.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 93.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 90.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 89.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 88.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 86.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 84.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 82.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 79.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 76.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 54.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 48.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 34.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 27.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.1% |
Chickasaw vs Spanish American Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spanish American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 45.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.2%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Spanish American Indian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Fair 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |