Chickasaw vs French Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
French
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
French
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,755
SOCIAL INDEX
55.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
169th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
French Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,572,773 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of French within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in French. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 32.7 French.
Chickasaw vs French Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $99,824, a difference of 21.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $93,665, a difference of 20.2%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $102,368, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,656, a difference of 11.0%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,457, a difference of 11.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | French |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Average $43,685 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Average $102,368 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,468 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,296 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Good $55,350 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,457 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $51,230 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Fair $93,665 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $99,824 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Fair $59,656 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.7% |
Chickasaw vs French Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.4%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | French |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Fair 17.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 15.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 16.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Chickasaw vs French Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 39.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | French |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs French Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | French |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 63.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 42.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
Chickasaw vs French Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 0.55%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | French |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Fair 64.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 33.4% |
Chickasaw vs French Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.3%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | French |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 59.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Chickasaw vs French Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | French |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Average 65.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 45.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Poor 36.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs French Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and French communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 35.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 27.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | French |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Poor 23.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Excellent 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.5% |