Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Luxembourger
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Luxembourgers
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Luxembourger Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,531,931 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.141% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 141.1 Luxembourgers.
Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,536, a difference of 26.0%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $45,663, a difference of 25.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $97,237, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.98%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,379, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,967, a difference of 13.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Luxembourger |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $45,663 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Excellent $106,183 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $86,418 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Excellent $47,640 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Excellent $56,300 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Average $39,891 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,379 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $97,237 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Excellent $103,536 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $60,967 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 50.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 49.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Luxembourger |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 35.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Luxembourger |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 6.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Luxembourger |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 45.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 86.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 86.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.7%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Luxembourger |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.11%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Luxembourger |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 5.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 94.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 34.4%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.13%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Luxembourger |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.2% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Excellent 39.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Luxembourger Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Luxembourger |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 44.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |