Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Dutch West Indian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Dutch West Indians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
988
SOCIAL INDEX
7.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
329th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Dutch West Indian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,936,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Dutch West Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 42.2 Dutch West Indians.
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $50,475, a difference of 6.5%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $81,852, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $79,171, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $77,260, a difference of 0.87%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,106, a difference of 0.90%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $40,107, a difference of 1.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $35,922 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $81,852 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $68,412 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $40,107 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $46,656 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $34,106 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,816 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $77,260 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $79,171 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $50,475 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Fair 26.3% |
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 16.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 17.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 24.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 21.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 16.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 27.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 19.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 36.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.3% |
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.95%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 61.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 78.2% |
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 5.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Average 64.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Poor 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 44.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.3% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 45.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 14.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 38.4% |
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Poor 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Poor 89.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Average 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Fair 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.2% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 86.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 81.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 57.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 50.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 36.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 28.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Chickasaw vs Dutch West Indian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Dutch West Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.66%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and female disability (15.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Dutch West Indian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 14.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.9% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 29.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 4.3% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.0% |