Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Zaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Zaire
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,349
SOCIAL INDEX
31.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
225th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zaire Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,852,338 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.504. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from Zaire. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 28.1 Immigrants from Zaire.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 21.8%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $38,848, a difference of 6.5%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $36,017, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $78,045, a difference of 0.15%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,512, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,325, a difference of 1.6%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zaire |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $38,848 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $89,285 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $71,801 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,325 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $47,070 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $36,017 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,529 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $78,045 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $85,207 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,512 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 20.1%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zaire |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 25.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 21.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 20.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 32.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Poor 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zaire |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zaire |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Excellent 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 82.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 14.6%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.89%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zaire |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 59.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 42.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 34.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 46.0%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 32.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zaire |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 51.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 34.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zaire |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Fair 95.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 95.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 64.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Poor 58.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Poor 45.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 36.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zaire Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zaire communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 57.0%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 53.4%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zaire |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Poor 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 19.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |