Chickasaw vs Spaniard Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Spaniard
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Spaniards
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,805
SOCIAL INDEX
35.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
210th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Spaniard Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,594,633 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Spaniards within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Spaniards. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 5.1 Spaniards.
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $99,889, a difference of 21.5%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $84,644, a difference of 20.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $93,366, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.78%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $38,656, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,059, a difference of 13.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Spaniard |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Fair $43,028 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $101,617 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Average $84,644 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $46,059 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Average $54,401 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $38,656 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $51,117 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Fair $93,366 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $99,889 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $60,866 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.0% |
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 20.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Spaniard |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 9.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Poor 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Poor 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Poor 20.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Fair 16.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Fair 17.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Fair 17.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 11.9% |
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Spaniard |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Poor 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.6% |
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Spaniard |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.5% |
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households (64.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Spaniard |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Excellent 47.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 33.6% |
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.52%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.30%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Spaniard |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 59.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 31.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Spaniard |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Good 96.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Good 95.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Average 94.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Average 92.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Fair 91.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Average 65.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 59.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 45.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 36.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Spaniard Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Spaniard communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 6.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Spaniard |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |