Chickasaw vs Swiss Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Swiss
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Swiss
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Swiss Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,990,711 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 38.7 Swiss.
Chickasaw vs Swiss Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $103,071, a difference of 25.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,511, a difference of 22.6%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $85,681, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,904, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,315, a difference of 13.9%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Swiss |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Good $44,076 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $104,396 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Average $85,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,315 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Good $55,731 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,904 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Poor $51,493 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $95,511 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Good $103,071 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Good $61,621 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 30.0% |
Chickasaw vs Swiss Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 35.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.6%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 15.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Swiss |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Average 20.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Fair 21.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Poor 29.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Chickasaw vs Swiss Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Swiss |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs Swiss Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Swiss |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 43.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 82.8% |
Chickasaw vs Swiss Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Swiss |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.15 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 49.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.5% |
Chickasaw vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Swiss |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 61.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 23.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Chickasaw vs Swiss Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 33.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.7%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Swiss |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Average 65.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Average 59.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 37.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Swiss Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 47.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 38.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.9%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Swiss |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 22.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |