Chickasaw vs Cypriot Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chickasaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chickasaw

Cypriots

Fair
Excellent
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cypriot Integration in Chickasaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,256,363 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 32.6 Cypriots.
Chickasaw Integration in Cypriot Communities

Chickasaw vs Cypriot Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $54,899, a difference of 50.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $123,396, a difference of 50.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $116,364, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,209, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $45,570, a difference of 32.4%).
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Income
Income MetricChickasawCypriot
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,475
Exceptional
$54,899
Median Family Income
Tragic
$85,356
Exceptional
$127,064
Median Household Income
Tragic
$70,005
Exceptional
$102,843
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,672
Exceptional
$54,589
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,832
Exceptional
$65,549
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,414
Exceptional
$45,570
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,763
Average
$52,209
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,929
Exceptional
$116,364
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,193
Exceptional
$123,396
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,732
Exceptional
$71,714
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
27.3%

Chickasaw vs Cypriot Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 56.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 49.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.9%).
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Poverty
Poverty MetricChickasawCypriot
Poverty
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.5%
Exceptional
19.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
14.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
13.2%
Single Males
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
19.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.0%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.4%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
8.9%

Chickasaw vs Cypriot Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChickasawCypriot
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
11.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Poor
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
4.9%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Chickasaw vs Cypriot Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChickasawCypriot
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.3%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
76.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.3%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Tragic
73.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
84.1%

Chickasaw vs Cypriot Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.0%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChickasawCypriot
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Tragic
25.9%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Exceptional
48.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.3%
Exceptional
27.0%

Chickasaw vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 99.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 48.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 33.6%).
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChickasawCypriot
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
15.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
84.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.0%
Tragic
50.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
16.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
5.0%

Chickasaw vs Cypriot Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 106.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 90.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Education Level
Education Level MetricChickasawCypriot
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.4%
Exceptional
91.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
88.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.4%
Exceptional
72.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.3%
Exceptional
67.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
56.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
49.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
21.8%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
6.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Chickasaw vs Cypriot Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 72.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.6%).
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Disability
Disability MetricChickasawCypriot
Disability
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
20.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.2%
Exceptional
43.5%
Vision
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%