Chickasaw vs Cypriot Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cypriot
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Cypriots
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Cypriot Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,256,363 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.175. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.033% in Cypriots. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 32.6 Cypriots.
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $54,899, a difference of 50.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $123,396, a difference of 50.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $116,364, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $52,209, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $45,570, a difference of 32.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Cypriot |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $54,899 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $127,064 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $102,843 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $54,589 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $65,549 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $45,570 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Average $52,209 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $116,364 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $123,396 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $71,714 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.3% |
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 56.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 49.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 18.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Cypriot |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 13.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Cypriot |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 19.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Poor 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Cypriot |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.4%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.0%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.5%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Cypriot |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 25.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 99.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 48.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 33.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Cypriot |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 84.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 50.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 16.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 106.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 90.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Cypriot |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 72.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 67.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 56.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Chickasaw vs Cypriot Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cypriot communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 72.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.7%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.4%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.6%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Cypriot |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 43.5% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Excellent 17.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |