Chickasaw vs Hopi Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Hopi
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Hopi
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hopi Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,244,294 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.563. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.194% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 194.3 Hopi.
Chickasaw vs Hopi Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 35.7%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $31,177, a difference of 17.0%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $42,060, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $33,932, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $75,002, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $46,978, a difference of 5.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Hopi |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $31,177 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $77,188 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $65,043 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $36,871 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $42,060 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $33,932 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $46,978 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $75,002 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $75,562 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $50,925 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Chickasaw vs Hopi Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 68.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 66.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.080%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 15.2%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Hopi |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 20.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 15.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 21.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 28.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 23.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 27.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 27.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 25.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 27.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 27.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 28.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 27.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 34.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 17.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 18.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 21.6% |
Chickasaw vs Hopi Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 108.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 100.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 100.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Hopi |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 10.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 21.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 30.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 19.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 13.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 8.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 7.4% |
Chickasaw vs Hopi Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 20.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Hopi |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 58.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 71.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 31.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 75.0% |
Chickasaw vs Hopi Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 40.0%), currently married (46.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 27.5%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Hopi |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 25.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 36.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.60 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 36.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 50.8% |
Chickasaw vs Hopi Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 74.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 6.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 20.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Hopi |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 13.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 86.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 49.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Chickasaw vs Hopi Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.3%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Hopi |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Good 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Good 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Good 95.9% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Fair 93.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 86.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 57.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 50.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 34.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 25.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chickasaw vs Hopi Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 166.0%), male disability (15.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 0.84%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Hopi |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 4.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 30.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 52.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.9% |