Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,411,943 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.799. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.271% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 271.4 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,266, a difference of 19.0%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.2%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $76,784, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,482, a difference of 0.74%), median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,737, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $52,085, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 51.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 48.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.63%), poverty (14.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.7%), currently married (46.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.37, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.22%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 26.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 81.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 67.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 59.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.1%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.0%).