Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Liberia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Liberia
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,533
SOCIAL INDEX
12.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
303rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Liberia Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,247,739 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.458. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.620% in Immigrants from Liberia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 619.9 Immigrants from Liberia.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 32.2%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,970, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $47,981, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,967, a difference of 0.44%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,317, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $80,863, a difference of 3.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Liberia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $38,165 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $90,450 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $74,896 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,923 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $48,317 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,970 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $47,981 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $80,863 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $87,739 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $53,967 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 28.5%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 19.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Liberia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 15.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 48.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Liberia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.1% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.6%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Liberia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 82.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.6%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 13.8%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Liberia |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 40.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 41.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 37.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 55.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 29.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Liberia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 51.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 45.9%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.060%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Liberia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Poor 93.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.4% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 88.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 42.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Liberia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Liberia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.6%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.6%), and male disability (15.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Liberia |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |