Chickasaw vs Danish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,384,526 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Danes within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Danes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 11.4 Danes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,619, a difference of 28.5%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $87,676, a difference of 25.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $97,221, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,730, a difference of 9.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $46,392, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 48.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 46.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.1%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.4%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 26.5%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 27.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Danish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.9%).