Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,438,968 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 16.6 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 18.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $78,682, a difference of 12.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $86,736, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $50,298, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $57,114, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,998, a difference of 8.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,827 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $94,472 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $78,682 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $43,998 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $50,298 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $38,028 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $48,749 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $86,736 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $91,385 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $57,114 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.3%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 10.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 19.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Fair 16.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Fair 11.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 39.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and family households (64.4% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 2.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 43.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 44.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Poor 32.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 32.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Poor 18.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 85.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.97%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.7% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 91.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 86.7% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 62.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 56.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 43.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 35.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 13.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 54.3%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.4%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Average 5.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Poor 24.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.5% |