Chickasaw vs Venezuelan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Venezuelan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Venezuelans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,739
SOCIAL INDEX
64.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
144th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Venezuelan Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,887,488 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Venezuelans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Venezuelans.
Chickasaw vs Venezuelan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $82,432, a difference of 17.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $96,460, a difference of 17.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $42,074, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,026, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,282, a difference of 8.3%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Venezuelan |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Poor $42,074 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $96,281 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Poor $82,432 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $44,580 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,510 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,282 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,011 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $88,232 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Poor $96,460 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,026 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Fair 26.3% |
Chickasaw vs Venezuelan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 38.3%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 31.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.45%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Venezuelan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Average 13.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 16.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Good 15.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 15.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 12.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Excellent 20.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 12.0% |
Chickasaw vs Venezuelan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Venezuelan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Venezuelan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.0%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Venezuelan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Chickasaw vs Venezuelan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.8%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.6%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Venezuelan |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Average 31.7% |
Chickasaw vs Venezuelan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 23.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.38%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Venezuelan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Excellent 56.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Venezuelan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 46.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.1%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.36%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Venezuelan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Excellent 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Average 97.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Excellent 91.7% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Excellent 66.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 49.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Excellent 15.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Venezuelan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Venezuelan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 71.2%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 69.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 9.2%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Venezuelan |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Excellent 46.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |