Chickasaw vs Jordanian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Jordanian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Jordanians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Jordanian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,806,864 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 4.8 Jordanians.
Chickasaw vs Jordanian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $109,376, a difference of 33.1%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $91,794, a difference of 31.1%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $109,865, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,796, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $64,313, a difference of 19.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Jordanian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Excellent $45,605 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $109,865 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $91,794 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $49,632 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $58,500 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,464 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Fair $51,796 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $99,186 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $109,376 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $64,313 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Chickasaw vs Jordanian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 40.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 39.6%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Jordanian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chickasaw vs Jordanian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.97%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Jordanian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Average 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Good 5.3% |
Chickasaw vs Jordanian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Jordanian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Fair 36.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Excellent 75.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Jordanian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 27.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.7%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Jordanian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Good 3.24 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Chickasaw vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.92%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 8.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Jordanian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chickasaw vs Jordanian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Jordanian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Excellent 2.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 97.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Excellent 97.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Excellent 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.3% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 49.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 41.2% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 4.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Jordanian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 59.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 58.8%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Jordanian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |