Chickasaw vs Iranian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Iranian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Iranians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,682
SOCIAL INDEX
94.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
8th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iranian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,899,631 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Iranians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Iranians.
Chickasaw vs Iranian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $58,786, a difference of 61.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $129,350, a difference of 57.4%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $109,835, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,548, a difference of 24.1%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $47,421, a difference of 37.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Iranian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $58,786 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $133,839 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $109,835 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $58,474 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $70,648 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $47,421 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $55,548 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $120,292 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $129,350 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $77,429 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 29.7% |
Chickasaw vs Iranian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 67.0%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 65.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 22.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Iranian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Average 20.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 18.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 25.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw vs Iranian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 32.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Iranian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Iranian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 16.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Iranian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 72.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Good 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Chickasaw vs Iranian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 43.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.15%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Iranian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Poor 63.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.18 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 25.3% |
Chickasaw vs Iranian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Iranian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Chickasaw vs Iranian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 126.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 108.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 95.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Iranian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.3% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 89.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 74.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 70.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 58.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 51.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 3.1% |
Chickasaw vs Iranian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 86.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 77.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 11.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Iranian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.0% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |