Chickasaw vs Italian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Italian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Italians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,365
SOCIAL INDEX
81.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
74th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Italian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,111 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Italians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.045% in Italians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 45.3 Italians.
Chickasaw vs Italian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $110,224, a difference of 34.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $104,215, a difference of 33.7%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $92,475, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,885, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,426, a difference of 19.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Italian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $47,574 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $112,372 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $92,475 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $49,915 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $59,551 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,505 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,426 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $104,215 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $110,224 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,885 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.1% |
Chickasaw vs Italian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 46.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.9%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Italian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chickasaw vs Italian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Italian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Italian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Italian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.3% |
Chickasaw vs Italian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.66%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Italian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.12 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Good 30.8% |
Chickasaw vs Italian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.7%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.060%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 0.96%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Italian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Chickasaw vs Italian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.3%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Italian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 67.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Excellent 61.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Excellent 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Italian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Italian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.7%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Italian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.9% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Average 11.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Good 2.4% |