Chickasaw vs Welsh Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Welsh
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Welsh
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,335
SOCIAL INDEX
60.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
156th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Welsh Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,420,514 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 7.7 Welsh.
Chickasaw vs Welsh Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $100,322, a difference of 22.1%), median family income ($85,356 compared to $102,151, a difference of 19.7%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,628, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $37,856, a difference of 10.0%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $45,710, a difference of 12.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Welsh |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Fair $43,233 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Average $102,151 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,628 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,710 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Average $54,647 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,856 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,597 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Fair $93,039 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $100,322 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $60,666 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 28.9% |
Chickasaw vs Welsh Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.2%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.8%), and male poverty (13.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 13.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Welsh |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Poor 14.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Average 17.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 30.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chickasaw vs Welsh Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 35.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Welsh |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 10.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Welsh Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Welsh |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 79.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 42.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Chickasaw vs Welsh Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 20.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.31%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.12, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Welsh |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Excellent 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Poor 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.12 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Fair 32.0% |
Chickasaw vs Welsh Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.77%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Welsh |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.5% |
Chickasaw vs Welsh Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 28.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Welsh |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.8% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.8% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Good 66.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Average 59.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Fair 45.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Fair 37.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Chickasaw vs Welsh Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 6.8%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 9.0%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Welsh |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Fair 23.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Excellent 47.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.5% |