Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Colombia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Colombia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Colombia
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
195th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Colombia Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,649,665 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Colombia within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Colombia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Immigrants from Colombia.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Colombia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $53,714, a difference of 20.0%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,902, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,290, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $57,658, a difference of 7.3%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,725, a difference of 10.2%), and wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 11.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Colombia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Fair $42,971 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $98,067 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,902 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,550 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,725 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $38,913 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,714 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Fair $92,204 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Poor $97,290 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $57,658 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Colombia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 41.1%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Colombia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 9.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Average 16.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Average 16.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 16.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Colombia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Colombia |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 7.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Colombia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Colombia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Colombia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.3%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.15%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Colombia |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Average 46.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Fair 46.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Fair 32.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Colombia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 38.9%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 33.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 28.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Colombia |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 87.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Colombia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 42.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 32.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.27%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Colombia |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 63.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Poor 57.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Average 37.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Average 14.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Colombia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Colombia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 65.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 65.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.7%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Colombia |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 2.4% |