Chickasaw vs European Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
European
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Europeans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,117
SOCIAL INDEX
78.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
87th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
European Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,182,945 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Europeans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 80.7 Europeans.
Chickasaw vs European Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and European communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $106,367, a difference of 29.4%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $88,751, a difference of 26.8%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $108,099, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.2%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,457, a difference of 14.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,796, a difference of 15.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | European |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $45,836 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $108,099 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $88,751 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Excellent $47,915 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $57,637 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Fair $39,457 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Fair $51,796 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $98,310 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $106,367 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,779 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 29.4% |
Chickasaw vs European Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and European communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.3%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.7%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 16.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | European |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Poor 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Average 21.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Average 29.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Chickasaw vs European Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | European |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chickasaw vs European Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | European |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Poor 84.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Fair 82.6% |
Chickasaw vs European Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and European communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.98%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | European |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 49.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Excellent 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Chickasaw vs European Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.81%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | European |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 61.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 22.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Chickasaw vs European Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | European |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 61.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Excellent 48.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Excellent 39.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Excellent 15.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chickasaw vs European Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and European communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 37.8%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 14.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | European |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Good 23.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |