Chickasaw vs Belizean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Belizean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Belizeans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,156
SOCIAL INDEX
9.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
320th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Belizean Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,055,572 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.742. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Belizeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 101.6 Belizeans.
Chickasaw vs Belizean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 27.9%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,094, a difference of 14.1%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $77,028, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $48,358, a difference of 1.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,580, a difference of 1.6%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $42,702, a difference of 5.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Belizean |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $39,097 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $90,880 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $77,028 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $42,702 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $48,358 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $37,429 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $51,094 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $84,534 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $88,684 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,580 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 21.2% |
Chickasaw vs Belizean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 27.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.36%), female poverty (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Belizean |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Average 20.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 20.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Average 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 31.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 13.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.8% |
Chickasaw vs Belizean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 6.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Belizean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.5% |
Chickasaw vs Belizean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Belizean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 32.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 80.8% |
Chickasaw vs Belizean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.3%), currently married (46.6% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.2%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.55%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Belizean |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Excellent 64.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 42.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.39 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 42.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 37.0% |
Chickasaw vs Belizean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 82.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 19.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 51.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Belizean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 14.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 85.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 51.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Average 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs Belizean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 77.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.59%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Belizean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.0% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.0% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 93.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 93.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 91.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 90.2% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 88.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 87.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 84.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 80.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 60.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 40.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 32.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chickasaw vs Belizean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Belizean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 49.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Belizean |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 11.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 25.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 49.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |