Chickasaw vs Thai Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Thai
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Thais
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Thai Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,410,905 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Thais within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in Thais. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 56.2 Thais.
Chickasaw vs Thai Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $110,648, a difference of 58.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $129,560, a difference of 57.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $121,778, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $59,187, a difference of 32.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $72,099, a difference of 34.2%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Thai |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $54,307 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $131,281 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $110,648 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $59,237 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $72,135 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $47,577 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $59,187 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $121,778 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $129,560 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $72,099 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 30.5% |
Chickasaw vs Thai Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 77.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 68.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Thai |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 17.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 24.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Chickasaw vs Thai Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.83%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Thai |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Chickasaw vs Thai Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Thai |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 67.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 74.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 84.3% |
Chickasaw vs Thai Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 51.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.1%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 8.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Thai |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 30.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 50.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 24.0% |
Chickasaw vs Thai Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Thai |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 19.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Fair 6.2% |
Chickasaw vs Thai Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 90.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 83.2%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 82.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Thai |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.0% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 89.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 73.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 68.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 57.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 50.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Chickasaw vs Thai Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Thai communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 87.8%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 82.6%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 75.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 12.8%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Thai |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 20.1% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.5% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.1% |