Chickasaw vs Icelander Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Icelander
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Icelanders
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Icelander Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,051,684 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Icelanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 96.6 Icelanders.
Chickasaw vs Icelander Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $102,261, a difference of 24.4%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $44,987, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $95,560, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $39,109, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $61,270, a difference of 14.0%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Icelander |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Excellent $44,987 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Good $104,282 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Good $85,797 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Good $46,916 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Good $55,415 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Fair $39,109 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $51,247 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Good $95,560 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Good $102,261 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Average $61,270 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.5% |
Chickasaw vs Icelander Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.5%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 31.0%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.91%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 13.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Icelander |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Good 11.9% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 13.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 21.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Excellent 16.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Excellent 15.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Excellent 12.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Poor 21.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Fair 29.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Chickasaw vs Icelander Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Icelander |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Poor 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Chickasaw vs Icelander Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Icelander |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Good 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Average 82.8% |
Chickasaw vs Icelander Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 19.7%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Icelander |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 6.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Excellent 47.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.3% |
Chickasaw vs Icelander Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 22.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Icelander |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.5% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Chickasaw vs Icelander Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 42.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Icelander |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.3% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Excellent 39.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Chickasaw vs Icelander Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Icelander communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.5%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Icelander |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Poor 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Average 23.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |