Chickasaw vs Mexican Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Mexican
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Mexicans
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,179
SOCIAL INDEX
9.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
319th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Mexican Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,486,855 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.449. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.411% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 411.2 Mexicans.
Chickasaw vs Mexican Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $49,989, a difference of 11.7%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $74,399, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $86,816, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($85,356 compared to $85,618, a difference of 0.31%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $53,897, a difference of 0.31%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $39,834, a difference of 2.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $34,559 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $85,618 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $74,399 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $39,834 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $46,147 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $33,664 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $49,989 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $80,427 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $86,816 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $53,897 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Fair 26.0% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.96%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.5% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Poor 20.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 20.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 20.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 25.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 33.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 7.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 6.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.83%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Poor 35.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Average 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 81.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 79.8% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.5%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and family households with children (28.2% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.7%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 69.0% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 31.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Excellent 47.1% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.48 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 45.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 36.9% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.2%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.84%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 11.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 61.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 24.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.9% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 94.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.2% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 94.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 91.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 91.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 90.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 87.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 86.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 84.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 81.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 77.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 55.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 49.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 35.0% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 27.1% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 2.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.2% |
Chickasaw vs Mexican Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Mexican |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 6.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 27.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 51.1% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.7% |