Chickasaw vs Cambodian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,724,038 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.052% in Cambodians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 52.3 Cambodians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $51,731, a difference of 41.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $114,342, a difference of 39.1%), and median family income ($85,356 compared to $117,780, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,571, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $66,892, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 51.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 45.5%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 52.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.6%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 36.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.15, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 77.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 75.0%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Cambodian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 64.2%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 62.6%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.0%).