Chickasaw vs Colombian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Colombian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Colombians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,155
SOCIAL INDEX
49.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
184th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Colombian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,236,177 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colombians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Colombians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 13.9 Colombians.
Chickasaw vs Colombian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $85,716, a difference of 22.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $99,772, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $94,565, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $58,851, a difference of 9.5%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,832, a difference of 12.5%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Colombian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Average $43,661 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $100,750 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Average $85,716 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Fair $53,832 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Fair $39,439 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $53,357 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Average $94,565 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Average $99,772 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $58,851 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Chickasaw vs Colombian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 38.5%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 34.2%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 17.0%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Colombian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Average 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Fair 9.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 16.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Good 15.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Good 16.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Good 15.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.9% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Poor 12.6% |
Chickasaw vs Colombian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Colombian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 11.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Fair 10.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Average 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Excellent 8.5% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.6% |
Chickasaw vs Colombian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Colombian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Excellent 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Colombian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.20%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Colombian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.3% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.3% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Good 46.8% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Average 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.6% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Fair 46.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Fair 32.2% |
Chickasaw vs Colombian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.2%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 52.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 24.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Colombian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 10.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 52.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Colombian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.11%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and 11th grade (92.3% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.68%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Colombian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 95.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 94.0% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.4% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 88.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Good 46.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Good 38.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Poor 1.7% |
Chickasaw vs Colombian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Colombian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 63.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Colombian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 2.4% |