Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Lebanon
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Lebanon
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,247
SOCIAL INDEX
60.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
158th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,226,264 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 80.8 Immigrants from Lebanon.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,471, a difference of 32.0%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $91,887, a difference of 31.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $101,124, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $50,729, a difference of 13.3%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $41,183, a difference of 19.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Lebanon |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $46,938 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $110,159 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $91,887 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $49,682 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $58,835 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,183 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,729 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $101,124 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $108,471 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $64,521 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 27.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 39.3%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.4%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.8%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Lebanon |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Poor 9.4% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Poor 11.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Fair 13.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Average 17.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Fair 16.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Fair 17.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Fair 17.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.6% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Fair 11.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Poor 12.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Good 11.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.93%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Lebanon |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.9% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.8% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 7.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Lebanon |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 35.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 82.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 43.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Lebanon |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Exceptional 25.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.68%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Lebanon |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Good 19.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Average 6.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 62.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 53.4%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.38%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Lebanon |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Fair 96.9% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Poor 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Fair 94.7% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Average 93.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Good 92.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Excellent 91.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Good 89.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 86.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.9% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 42.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Lebanon Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 57.1%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.0%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 7.5%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Lebanon |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Fair 47.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Good 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Poor 2.5% |