Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Thailand
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Thailand
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,353
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
224th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Thailand Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,741,597 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Thailand within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.689. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Immigrants from Thailand. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 58.0 Immigrants from Thailand.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $83,327, a difference of 19.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $97,400, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $91,337, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $52,908, a difference of 10.6%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $60,217, a difference of 12.1%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Thailand |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Poor $42,289 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Poor $99,840 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Fair $83,327 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Fair $45,598 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Poor $52,908 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Poor $38,810 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $50,645 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Poor $91,337 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Poor $97,400 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Fair $60,217 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.5% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.8%), single father poverty (19.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Thailand |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 13.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 9.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 12.2% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 14.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 18.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 17.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 17.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Fair 13.0% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Poor 29.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Average 11.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Poor 12.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Thailand |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Poor 5.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Average 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Average 5.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Thailand |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 65.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Poor 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.1%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.070%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Thailand |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 45.2% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 45.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Fair 12.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Poor 32.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 21.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Thailand |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 90.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 56.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 6.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 59.4%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.24%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.85%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Thailand |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 88.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Fair 64.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Poor 45.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Poor 36.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Poor 14.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Fair 4.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Average 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Thailand Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Thailand communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.0%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Thailand |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.0% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Poor 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 12.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Fair 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 17.9% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.6% |