Chickasaw vs Indonesian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Indonesian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Indonesians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,685
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
247th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Indonesian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,480,065 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Indonesians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Indonesians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Indonesians.
Chickasaw vs Indonesian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.6%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $36,140, a difference of 5.0%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $72,856, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,503, a difference of 0.69%), householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,176, a difference of 0.83%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $45,566, a difference of 1.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Indonesian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $37,300 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $88,301 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $72,856 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $41,701 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $47,503 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $36,140 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $45,566 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $79,543 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $84,890 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $54,176 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.7% |
Chickasaw vs Indonesian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.3% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 15.7%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.0%), male poverty (13.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and poverty (14.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Indonesian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 15.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 22.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 21.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 20.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 21.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 24.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 32.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Poor 11.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.9% |
Chickasaw vs Indonesian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.43%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Indonesian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Average 7.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Fair 5.5% |
Chickasaw vs Indonesian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Indonesian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Fair 79.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 40.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 81.5% |
Chickasaw vs Indonesian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.8%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.8%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Indonesian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 61.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 42.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.28 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 43.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 35.0% |
Chickasaw vs Indonesian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 21.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Indonesian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Average 10.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 89.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 53.4% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 18.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Indonesian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 89.4%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 1.3%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Indonesian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 95.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 94.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.1% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 91.8% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 90.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 88.6% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 86.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 82.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 61.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 55.1% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 41.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 33.5% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chickasaw vs Indonesian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Indonesian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 24.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Average 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 6.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Average 2.5% |